Ecological accounting for an integrated "pig-biogas-fish" system based on emergetic indicators

57Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With the expansion of urbanization in China, the integrated biogas-utilization system has gained its popularity for both renewable energy production and multi-level utilization of organic waste. To appraise the ecological performance of the integrated biogas system, systematic accounting is undertaken for an integrated "pig-biogas-fish" system in Hubei province, China. Based on Odum's concept of embodied solar energy as a unified measure for environmental resources, human labors and purchased goods, a set of emergetic indicators are employed to quantify the system sustainability. The results reveal that in a 20-year designed lifetime scenario, 94.69% of the total emergy inputs for the "pig-biogas-fish" system are attributed to purchased social resources. Three kinds of products, namely pig, biogas, fish are taken into consideration, and transformity of the "pig-biogas-fish" system is calculated as 1.26E + 05 seJ/J. Compared with the Chinese conventional agriculture system, the integrated biogas system shows a higher sustainability. Given that most biogas systems have a lifespan less than 20 years, for the "pig-biogas-fish" system, six other scenarios with different lifespans are studied to investigate the impact of the lifespan on sustainability. The findings suggest that the "pig-biogas-fish" system should be well operated for at least 8 years to prove its advantage in ecological economy over the conventional agriculture system. This has essential policy implications that local government should strengthen subsequent management on biogas production to extend the practical service life of the biogas system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, X. F., Wu, X. D., Li, J. S., Xia, X. H., Mi, T., Yang, Q., … Alsaedi, A. (2014). Ecological accounting for an integrated “pig-biogas-fish” system based on emergetic indicators. Ecological Indicators, 47, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free