Quantification is neither necessary nor sufficient for measurement

12Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Being an infrastructural, widespread activity, measurement is laden with stereotypes. Some of these concern the role of measurement in the relation between quality and quantity. In particular, it is sometimes argued or assumed that quantification is necessary for measurement; it is also sometimes argued or assumed that quantification is sufficient for or synonymous with measurement. To assess the validity of these positions the concepts of measurement and quantitative evaluation should be independently defined and their relationship analyzed. We contend that the defining characteristic of measurement should be the structure of the process, not a feature of its results. Under this perspective, quantitative evaluation is neither sufficient nor necessary for measurement. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mari, L., Maul, A., Irribarra, D. T., & Wilson, M. (2013). Quantification is neither necessary nor sufficient for measurement. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 459). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/459/1/012007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free