Does diet quality matter? A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

4Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This secondary analysis assessed the association of a plant-based index (PDI), healthful (hPDI), and unhealthful (uPDI), with weight loss in overweight adults. Participants (n = 244) were randomly assigned to a vegan (n = 122) or control group (n = 122) for 16 weeks. Three-day dietary records were analyzed and PDI indices were calculated. A repeated measure ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. All three scores increased in the vegan group; the effect sizes were: PDI +10.6 (95% CI +8.6 to +12.6; p < 0.001); hPDI +10.9 (95% CI +8.4 to +13.4; p < 0.001); and uPDI +5.4 (95% CI +3.4 to +7.4; p < 0.001). The change in all three scores significantly correlated with change in body weight: PDI (r = −0.40; p < 0.001); hPDI (r = −0.37; p < 0.001); and uPDI (r = −0.21; p = 0.002). These findings suggest that minimizing the consumption of animal products and oil may be an effective weight loss strategy in overweight adults. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02939638.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kahleova, H., Brennan, H., Znayenko-Miller, T., Holubkov, R., & Barnard, N. D. (2024). Does diet quality matter? A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78(3), 270–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-023-01371-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free