An Experimental Study on Attribute Validity of Code Quality Evaluation Model

Abstract

Regarding the practicality of the quality evaluation model, the lack of quantitative experimental evaluation affects the effective use of the quality model, and also a lack of effective guidance for choosing the model. Aiming at this problem, based on the sensitivity of the quality evaluation model to code defects, a machine learning-based quality evaluation attribute validity verification method is proposed. This method conducts comparative experiments by controlling variables. First, extract the basic metric elements; then, convert them into quality attributes of the software; finally, to verify the quality evaluation model and the effectiveness of medium quality attributes, this paper compares machine learning methods based on quality attributes with those based on text features, and conducts experimental evaluation in two data sets. The result shows that the effectiveness of quality attributes under control variables is better, and leads by 15% in AdaBoostClassifier; when the text feature extraction method is increased to 50-150 dimensions, the performance of the text feature in the four machine learning algorithms overtakes the quality attributes; but when the peak is reached, quality attributes are more stable. This also provides a direction for the optimization of the quality model and the use of quality assessment in different situations.