Labor-inclusive corporatism after democratic transitions: Institutionalization in South Africa and Brazil

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Under what conditions has corporatist policymaking become institutionalized in newly transitioned democracies? I argue that transitions have provided temporary opportunities for unions to push for laws they can later use to protect their place in economic councils. The relevant sets of legal rules, which I call compulsory deliberation, enable non-'State official' members to resist governmental disruption of such councils despite them composing the Executive's structure. I compare South Africa and Brazil, two 'most similar' cases that featured sequences of chronically unstable labor-excluding councils under authoritarian regimes. I argue that the former broke out of this trajectory while the latter did not because South African unions developed aspirations for durable policy influence before the transition, whereas Brazilian ones only did so afterward and thus mobilized too late. Although Brazilian governments have enacted dozens of regulations covering as many councils, these have only served as short-term instruments for marketing policies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Castro, H. A. (2025). Labor-inclusive corporatism after democratic transitions: Institutionalization in South Africa and Brazil. Socio-Economic Review, 23(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwae065

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free