Comparing the Bank Failure Prediction Performance of Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines: The Turkish Case

  • Ecer F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Experience from the banking crises during the past two decades suggest that advanced prediction models are needed for helping prevent bank failures. This paper compares the ability of artificial neural networks and support vector machines in predicting bank failures. Although artificial neural networks have widely been applied complex problems in business, the literature utilizing support vector machines is relatively narrow and their capability for predicting bank failures is not very familiar. In this paper, these two intelligent techniques are applied to a dataset of Turkish commercial banks. Empirical findings show that although the prediction performance of the two models can be considered as satisfactory, neural networks show slightly better predictive ability than support vector machines. In addition, different types of error from each model also indicate that neural network models are better predictors. © 2013 Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Department for Economics and Tourism "Dr. Mijo Mirković".

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ecer, F. (2013). Comparing the Bank Failure Prediction Performance of Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines: The Turkish Case. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 26(3), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2013.11517623

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free