Preoperative melatonin and its effects on induction and emergence in children undergoing anesthesia and surgery

95Citations
Citations of this article
149Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Studies conducted in adults undergoing surgery reported a beneficial effect of oral melatonin administered before surgery. There is a paucity of such data in children undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Methods: Children undergoing surgery were randomly assigned to receive preoperatively oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg or oral melatonin 0.05 mg/kg, 0.2 mg/kg, or 0.4 mg/kg. The primary outcome of the study was preoperative anxiety (Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale). The secondary outcomes were the children's compliance with induction (Induction Compliance Checklist), emergence behavior (Keegan scale), and parental anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory). Results: Repeated measures ANOVA showed that children who received melatonin at any of the three doses were more anxious compared with children who received midazolam (P < 0.001). Parental anxiety did not differ on the basis of the experimental condition (P = ns). The melatonin groups showed a dose-response effect on emergence behavior. Children who received melatonin developed less emergence delirium compared with those who received midazolam (P < 0.05), and the effect was dose related; the incidence after 0.05 mg/kg melatonin was 25.0%, incidence after 0.2 mg/kg melatonin was 8.3%, and incidence after 0.4 mg/kg melatonin was 5.4%. Conclusions: Midazolam is more effective than melatonin in reducing children's anxiety at induction of anesthesia. Melatonin showed a direct dose-dependent effect on emergence delirium. Copyright © 2009, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kain, Z. N., Maclaren, J. E., Herrmann, L., Mayes, L., Rosenbaum, A., Hata, J., & Lerman, J. (2009). Preoperative melatonin and its effects on induction and emergence in children undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Anesthesiology, 111(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a91870

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free