Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users

  • Jones G
  • Ho Won J
  • Drennan W
  • et al.
70Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) users can achieve remarkable speech understanding, but there is great variability in outcomes that is only partially accounted for by age, residual hearing, and duration of deafness. Results might be improved with the use of psychophysical tests to predict which sound processing strategies offer the best potential outcomes. In particular, the spectral-ripple discrimination test offers a time-efficient, nonlinguistic measure that is correlated with perception of both speech and music by CI users. Features that make this “one-point” test time-efficient, and thus potentially clinically useful, are also connected to controversy within the CI field about what the test measures. The current work examined the relationship between thresholds in the one-point spectral-ripple test, in which stimuli are presented acoustically, and interaction indices measured under the controlled conditions afforded by direct stimulation with a research processor. Results of these studies include the following: (1) within individual subjects there were large variations in the interaction index along the electrode array, (2) interaction indices generally decreased with increasing electrode separation, and (3) spectral-ripple discrimination improved with decreasing mean interaction index at electrode separations of one, three, and five electrodes. These results indicate that spectral-ripple discrimination thresholds can provide a useful metric of the spectral resolution of CI users.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jones, G. L., Ho Won, J., Drennan, W. R., & Rubinstein, J. T. (2013). Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(1), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4768881

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free