The aim of this paper is to create a panel comparing some of the key decision-making support tools used in situations with the characteristics of the problem of selecting suitable areas for constructing a final deep geologic repository. The tools addressed in this work are also well known and with easy implementation. The decision-making process in matters of this kind is, in general, complex due to its multicriteria nature and the conflicting opinions of various stakeholders. Thus, a comprehensive study was performed with the literature in this subject, specifically in documents of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), regarding the importance of the criteria involved in the decision-making process. Therefore, we highlighted six judgment attributes for selecting a decision support tool, suitable for the problem. For this study, we have selected the following multicriteria tools: AHP, Delphi, Brainstorm, Nominal Group Technique and AHP-Delphi. Finally, the AHP-Delphi method has demonstrated to be more appropriate for managing the inherent multiple attributes to the problem proposed.
CITATION STYLE
Guiller Madeira, J., Alvim, A. C. M., Martins, V. B., & Monteiro, N. A. (2016). Selection of a tool to decision making for site selection for high level waste. EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, 2, 6. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/e2015-50039-x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.