Comparative Analysis of Cone Resistances in Cone Penetration Test (CPTu) and Dynamic Probe Heavy Test (DPH)

8Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of geotechnical soil testing with the use of Piezocone Penetration Test (CPTu) and Dynamic Probing Heavy (DPH) in a uniform coarse-grained medium located in southwest part of Poland. The soil medium was identified in detail. The interpretation of results included both grain-size analysis of samples from drillholes and soil behavior type results obtained from the Robertson nomograph (Soil behaviour type from the CPT: an update. In: 2nd international symposium on cone penetration testing, USA, 2010). Cone penetration resistances qc obtained in the static CPTu tests were compared with the results of dynamic probing N10H and of dynamic point resistance qd obtained in the dynamic DPH tests. The evaluation of soil density index was based on both dynamic DPH and static CPTu probing. The obtained results were analyzed and plotted in a form of graphs corresponding to the Eurocode 7 and other works describing coarse-grained soils.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bagińska, I. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Cone Resistances in Cone Penetration Test (CPTu) and Dynamic Probe Heavy Test (DPH). Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38(5), 5269–5278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01362-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free