Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs: Concurrent validity

4Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite the significant amount of time undergraduate students spend in introductory physics labs, there is little consensus on instructional goals and accepted diagnostic assessments for these labs. In response to these issues, we have developed the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC) to assess students' proficiency with critical thinking in a physics lab context. Specifically, the PLIC aims to evaluate students' skills in making sense of data, variability, models, and experimental methods and to assess the effectiveness of lab courses at developing these skills. Here, we discuss two parts of the validation process using 3374 student responses collected from 12 institutions during the 2017-2018 academic year. As a part of our validation process, we evaluate the concurrent validity of the instrument, namely, the impact of physics maturity and lab design on student performance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walsh, C., Quinn, K. N., & Holmes, N. G. (2018). Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs: Concurrent validity. In Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2018). American Association of Physics Teachers. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2018.pr.walsh

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free