Antithrombotic alternatives for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Critical differences and remaining questions

7Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Three therapeutic alternatives for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation are available in dabigatran (an oral direct thrombin inhibitor), rivaroxaban, and apixaban (both oral blood coagulation factor Xa inhibitors). Compared with warfarin, these new agents have a more predictable pharmacodynamic response and fewer major clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. These agents also have few, if any, food-drug interactions, and infrequent or no need for routine laboratory monitoring. These agents also bring new disadvantages, particularly lack of clearly defined reversal strategies, inability to effectively monitor patient response, and higher cost. Selection of the most appropriate oral antithrombotic agent for a given patient is dependent on clinician knowledge of the similarities and critical differences between the available antithrombotic medications. © 2013 Kalus JS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kalus, J. S. (2013, April 16). Antithrombotic alternatives for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Critical differences and remaining questions. Drugs in Context. Just Medical Media Ltd. https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.212251

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free