Towards annotating potential incoherences in bioportal mappings

27Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BioPortal is a repository for biomedical ontologies that also includes mappings between them from various sources. Considered as a whole, these mappings may cause logical errors, due to incompatibilities between the ontologies or even erroneous mappings. We have performed an automatic evaluation of BioPortal mappings between 19 ontology pairs using the mapping repair systems of LogMap and Agreement-MakerLight. We found logical errors in 11 of these pairs, which on average involved 22% of the mappings between each pair. Furthermore, we conducted a manual evaluation of the repair results to identify the actual sources of error, verifying that erroneous mappings were behind over 60% of the repairs. Given the results of our analysis, we believe that annotating BioPortal mappings with information about their logical conflicts with other mappings would improve their usability for semantic web applications and facilitate the identification of erroneous mappings. In future work, we aim to collaborate with BioPortal developers in extending BioPortal with these annotations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faria, D., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Pesquita, C., Santos, E., & Couto, F. M. (2014). Towards annotating potential incoherences in bioportal mappings. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8797, pp. 17–32). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11915-1_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free