Randomised comparison of early versus late induction of labour in cost-term oreenancv

57Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In a prospective randomised study of mothers referred for prolonged pregnancy (around the 42nd week) 214 (group 1) were submitted to attempted induction of labour and 195 (group 2) assigned to continue for a further week without intervention. Strict selection criteria were used for the certainty of term. Mothers in group 2 were given regular non-stress tests to ensure fetal wellbeing, as were those in group 1 in whom induction failed. In group 1, 48 (23%) out of 210 first attempted inductions failed. In group 2, 135 (69%) of the births started spontaneously as compared with 38 (18%) in group 1. The mean duration of labour was 7•5 hours in each group. There was no significant difference in incidence of operative delivery, use of analgesics, or signs of perinatal asphyxia. Significantly more children in group 1 needed phototherapy for hyperbilirubinaemia. There was a clustering of births in the late afternoon and evening, which was most pronounced in group 1. A policy of vigilant non-intervention up to the 44th completed week of pregnancy does not appearto to jeopardise mother or fetus. © 1987, British Medical Journal Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Augensen, K., Per Bergs, P. B. T., Eikelane, T., Askvik, K., & Carlsen, J. (1987). Randomised comparison of early versus late induction of labour in cost-term oreenancv. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.), 294(6581), 1192–1195. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.294.6581.1192

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free