Looking ahead: Health impact assessment of front-of-pack nutrition labelling schema as a public health measure

8Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the underlying process, used methods and major recommendations emerging from a comprehensive and prospective health impact assessment of the endorsement of a front-of-pack nutrition labelling (FOP-NL) system by the Portuguese health authorities. A mixed-methods approach was used to gather information on the impact of four FOP-NL schemes on consumers’ selection of food products according to the perception of their nutritional quality, combining a systematic literature review, focus groups (FG), in-depth individual interviews, and an open-label crossover randomized controlled study. The relevance of FOP-NL as a public health promotion policy has emerged as a consensual idea among either FGs’ participants (i.e., consumers and experts), or interviewed stakeholders. Although all of the evaluated FOP-NLs result better than no system on promoting the choice of the healthiest product, the effectiveness of easy-to-interpret FOP-NL among vulnerable groups raised concerns related to the need of integrating specific nutritional information to promote a better self-management of chronic diseases, and related to the level of literacy of consumers, which could impair the usage of FOP-NL. Educational campaigns addressing skills to use FOP-NL is recommended. Furthermore, a monitoring strategy should be considered to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of this policy in promoting healthier food choices, and in reducing diet-related non-communicable diseases burden.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feteira-Santos, R., Alarcão, V., Santos, O., Virgolino, A., Fernandes, J., Vieira, C. P., … Graça, P. (2021). Looking ahead: Health impact assessment of front-of-pack nutrition labelling schema as a public health measure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041422

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free