Trayectorias de control y covariación de variables como expresión del cambio cognitivo en la solución de un problema

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research characterizes paths and trajectories followed by 136 university subjects while solving a physical-mathematical problem of proportionality, proposed through an interactive software, in order to analyze the intra- and inter-subject variability, regarding the type of control variables and co-variation used. Five types of control variables (a: No Control, b: Simple Control, c: Simple Control greater than two attempts, d: Alternating Control and e: Controlled Change) and four of co-variation (f: No co-variation, g: Increasing co-variation, h: Decreasing co-variation and i: Mixed co-variation) were evidenced. The microgenetic method with qualitative and quantitative measures was used. The various paths and trajectories witness cognitive change in solving the problem. It is concluded that there is a significant variability in the procedures used by the population, as well as significant differences with respect to trajectories with consolidated control or co-variation compared to those that did not have it, also among those with paths with intermittence and without intermittence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Melo, H. A. E., Correa, R. A., & García, J. C. (2016). Trayectorias de control y covariación de variables como expresión del cambio cognitivo en la solución de un problema. Universitas Psychologica, 15(1), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-1.tccv

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free