Abstract
This research characterizes paths and trajectories followed by 136 university subjects while solving a physical-mathematical problem of proportionality, proposed through an interactive software, in order to analyze the intra- and inter-subject variability, regarding the type of control variables and co-variation used. Five types of control variables (a: No Control, b: Simple Control, c: Simple Control greater than two attempts, d: Alternating Control and e: Controlled Change) and four of co-variation (f: No co-variation, g: Increasing co-variation, h: Decreasing co-variation and i: Mixed co-variation) were evidenced. The microgenetic method with qualitative and quantitative measures was used. The various paths and trajectories witness cognitive change in solving the problem. It is concluded that there is a significant variability in the procedures used by the population, as well as significant differences with respect to trajectories with consolidated control or co-variation compared to those that did not have it, also among those with paths with intermittence and without intermittence.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Melo, H. A. E., Correa, R. A., & García, J. C. (2016). Trayectorias de control y covariación de variables como expresión del cambio cognitivo en la solución de un problema. Universitas Psychologica, 15(1), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-1.tccv
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.