False positive ultrasensitive HIV bDNA viral load results in diagnosis of perinatal HIV-infection in the era of low transmission

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The performance of ultrasensitive, quantitative assays in the diagnosis of perinatal HIV has not been documented in a population with low perinatal transmission due to use of antiretroviral therapy. Methods: We studied 205 plasma samples from 71 perinatally-exposed infants for HIV diagnosis using a quantitative branched DNA (bDNA) assay with a detection range of 75-500,000 copies/mL. Results: Twelve (16.9%) infants had at least 1 positive bDNA result. Two (2.8%) infants had confirmed HIV-infections as determined by ≥2 subsequent positive bDNA results (range=1,818-500,000 copies/mL). The remaining 10 (14.5%) infants had 1 positive bDNA test (range=81-440 copies/mL) with 2 subsequent negative bDNA tests and/or a negative HIV ELISA test; these infants were considered to have a false-positive result. The performance of internal assay standards was within acceptable limits. Conclusions: Our study suggests caution is needed in the interpretation of single, low-level, positive results of the ultrasensitive, quantitative bDNA test for HIV diagnosis of perinatallyexposed infants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel, J. A., Anderson, E., & Dong, J. (2009). False positive ultrasensitive HIV bDNA viral load results in diagnosis of perinatal HIV-infection in the era of low transmission. Laboratory Medicine, 40(10), 611–614. https://doi.org/10.1309/LMAOTFWVLH1B5A5K

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free