Survey Methods: How Planning Practitioners Use Them, and the Implications for Planning Education

2Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article is concerned with two aspects of how planning practitioners use survey-derived data; how planners integrate the limitations of survey questionnaires into practice, and the prevalence of such data within planning. Using a web survey (n = 201) and interviews (n = 18) of Canadian municipal planners, I find that survey data are heavily relied on, but many planners do not seem to be aware of cognitive biases when designing surveys, and those that are, have little knowledge of how they ought to mitigate them. To develop planners’ understanding of these biases and improve the survey data they collect, quantitative methods courses within planning curricula could respond by expanding beyond statistical analysis to incorporate survey design and “the total survey error approach” of survey methodology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maguire, M. (2024). Survey Methods: How Planning Practitioners Use Them, and the Implications for Planning Education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 44(2), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X211043272

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free