“The Cat Sat on the …?” Why Generative AI Has Limited Creativity

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since the introduction of Generative AI several years ago, there has been much debate regarding the capacity of this technology for creativity. This paper applies the standard definition of creativity to the output of Large Language Models (LLMs) and shows not only that this can be calculated ex ante, but that LLM output creativity has a fundamental upper limit. This upper limit, determined by the mechanism used to produce LLM outputs, moreover, is constrained to a level equivalent to the boundary between little-c and Pro-c creativity. Consequently, LLM creativity is mathematically constrained to a level equivalent to the boundary between amateur and professional human creativity. This has significant implications for claims about AI autonomy in creative tasks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cropley, D. H. (2025). “The Cat Sat on the …?” Why Generative AI Has Limited Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 59(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.70077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free