Abstract
Temperature evolutions of the electronic specific heat Ce(T) [A. Amon, Phys. Rev. B 97, 014501 (2018)10.1103/PhysRevB.97.014501] and the thermodynamic critical field Bc(T) [R. Khasanov, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023142 (2020)10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023142] of the BeAu superconductor were reconsidered within the framework of the single-gap and two-gap scenarios. The analysis shows that the single-gap approach, by being able to describe satisfactorily the temperature dependence of Ce(T), fails in the case of Bc(T). The self-consistent two-gap model, in contrast, is able to describe both thermodynamic quantities by using a similar set of parameters. Our results imply that in some particular cases, such as in the case of BeAu, measurement of one single thermodynamic quantity may not be enough in order to speculate on the nature of the superconducting pairing mechanism.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Khasanov, R., Gupta, R., Das, D., Leithe-Jasper, A., & Svanidze, E. (2020). Single-gap versus two-gap scenario: Specific heat and thermodynamic critical field of the noncentrosymmetric superconductor BeAu. Physical Review B, 102(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014514
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.