DRASTIC, GOD, and SI approaches for assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution: a review

68Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Over the last three to four decades, several methods for assessing groundwater vulnerability to anthropogenic pollution have been developed. Researchers and policymakers have widely used these methods for preventing groundwater pollution through knowledge about particularly vulnerable areas. This systematic review presents different and significant methods for assessing the vulnerability of aquifers for the protection of the resource. Previous studies mentioned that formulating a single technique for assessing groundwater vulnerability is difficult; thus, different methods and techniques have been proposed. Therefore, this paper presents three methods, namely, DRASTIC, GOD, and susceptibility index (SI), which will be discussed in detail, and highlights their advantages and limitations. In doing so, the study introduces the concept of aquifer vulnerability, and further discussion will be devoted to the three methods. Lastly, the study outlines the major challenges to the assessment of aquifer vulnerability. The review concludes the importance of groundwater vulnerability and strategies for preserving its quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fannakh, A., & Farsang, A. (2022, December 1). DRASTIC, GOD, and SI approaches for assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution: a review. Environmental Sciences Europe. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00646-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free