Techno-economic assessment of mechanised reaping and sickle cutting options for smallholder rice farmers

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Technical and economic performance of mechanized reaping and sickle harvesting methods were assessed under farmer’s field conditions in the Ashanti Region of Ghana for Amankwatia and AGRA rice varieties. Harvesting trials and field measurements were statistically analyzed as a split-plot layout in a randomized complete block design with three replicates at p < 0.05. Breakeven analysis for both harvesting options was conducted. Harvesting efficiency, field capacity, grain loss, and harvesting speed, respectively, ranged from 83.53% to 91.16%, 0.019 ha/h to 0.28 ha/h, 0.16% to 0.26%, and 0.19 km/h to 2.43 km/h for manual cutting with the sickle and mechanized reaping, irrespective of rice variety. Manual cutting was better at reducing grain loss irrespective of rice variety whereas Amankwatia offered significantly lower grain losses. The mechanized reaper was economically viable over manual cutting, breaking even after only 150 h of machine use and offering a substantially higher profit margin.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amponsah, S. K., Addo, A., Bessah, E., & Kumi, F. (2020). Techno-economic assessment of mechanised reaping and sickle cutting options for smallholder rice farmers. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1847888

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free