Between human rights and nationalism: Silencing as a mechanism of memory in the post-yugoslav wars’ Serbia

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Just as norm-complying states adapt their practices to expected behaviors, post-conflict states are forced to adapt their practices and rhetoric to better resist pressures to comply with particular norms. Building on this insight, this paper analyzes three mechanisms through which the ruling elite in present day Serbia strategically constructed commemorative arenas for the purpose of dealing with the opposing demands and norms made both on the international as well as the national level: 1) de-contextualization of memory contents, 2) creation of social narratives of suffering and 3) promotion of the Holocaust memory as a screen memory. These are strategies of silencing which prevent public debate, representation, negotiation and are intended to reduce the tension between the contradicting demands at the international and the domestic levels. I suggest that the gap between the local and global forces and the changing role of the state, makes it possible for memory content to become a currency, a means of achieving certain real or symbolic benefits.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

David, L. E. A. (2015). Between human rights and nationalism: Silencing as a mechanism of memory in the post-yugoslav wars’ Serbia. Journal of Regional Security, 10(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.11643/issn.2217-995X151SPD51

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free