Can Historical Control Group Data Be Used to Replace Concurrent Controls in Animal Studies?

10Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The availability of large amounts of high-quality control data from tightly controlled regulated animal safety data has created the idea to re-use these data beyond its classical applications of quality control, identification of treatment-related effects and assessing effect-size relevance for building virtual control groups (VCGs). While the ethical and cost-saving aspects of such a concept are immediately evident, the potential challenges need to be carefully considered to avoid any effect which could lower the sensitivity of an animal study to detect adverse events, safety thresholds, target organs, or biomarkers. In our brief communication, we summarize the current discussion regarding VCGs and propose a path forward how the replacement of concurrent control with VCGs resulting from historical data could be systematically assessed and to come to conclusions regarding the scientific value of the concept.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steger-Hartmann, T., & Clark, M. (2023). Can Historical Control Group Data Be Used to Replace Concurrent Controls in Animal Studies? Toxicologic Pathology, 51(6), 361–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/01926233231208987

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free