On historicity and transcendentality again. Foucault's trajectory from existential psychiatry to historical epistemology

16Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper I focus on the emergence of the concept of the "historical a priori" at the origin of Foucault's archeology. I emphasize the methodological function of this con-cept within Foucault's archaeology, and I maintain that despite the different thesis it entails as compared to its philosophical sources, it pertains to one of the main issues of phenomenology, that is, the problematization of the relation between reality as it appears in its historicity, and transcendentality. I start from the interest of the young Foucault in existential psychiatry, and I focus on the French philosophical context in which Foucault's Introduction to Ludwig Binswanger's "Dream and Existence" (1954) was conceived. My aim is to show that the first "phenomenological" phase of Foucault's work is coherent, from a methodological point of view, with the development of archaeology intended as "historical epistemology." I conclude by arguing that Foucault's archaeology is methodologically linked to Canguilhem's episte-mology, in that the latter presents itself as an important attempt at linking together historicity and transcendentality. © Elisabetta Basso 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Basso, E. (2012). On historicity and transcendentality again. Foucault’s trajectory from existential psychiatry to historical epistemology. Foucault Studies. Copenhagen Business School, Department of International Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i14.3904

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free