Inclusive prompt engineering for large language models: a modular framework for ethical, structured, and adaptive AI

6Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Large language models have achieved impressive results across various tasks but remain limited in their ability to adapt ethically and structurally across diverse domains without retraining. This paper presents the Inclusive Prompt Engineering Model (IPEM), a modular framework designed to enhance LLM performance, adaptability, and ethical alignment through prompt-level strategies alone. IPEM integrates four components: Memory-of-Thought for multi-turn consistency, Enhanced Chain-of-Thought prompting for logical verification, Structured and Analogical Reasoning modules for tabular and cross-domain tasks, and Evaluation and Feedback Loops that incorporate uncertainty-aware selection and bias mitigation mechanisms. Evaluated across tasks in arithmetic reasoning, healthcare triage, financial forecasting, and inclusive question answering, IPEM consistently improves model outputs over a GPT-4 baseline. Notable outcomes include up to twenty percentage points in accuracy gains, a 25 percent reduction in logical errors, and nearly 20 percent reduction in social bias scores, all without modifying model weights. Moreover, IPEM reduces annotation demands by one-third while preserving performance, demonstrating its utility in low-resource environments. By unifying ethical safeguards and reasoning mechanisms in a prompt-based system, IPEM offers a reproducible and auditable pathway for deploying adaptable and fair AI systems. The framework contributes both practical solutions and theoretical insights to the evolving field of prompt engineering.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Torkestani, M. S., Alameer, A., Palaiahnakote, S., & Manosuri, T. (2025). Inclusive prompt engineering for large language models: a modular framework for ethical, structured, and adaptive AI. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11330-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free