The process-based hydrological model Soil and Water Assessment Tool ensures the simulation s reliability by calibration. Compared to the commonly applied single-objective calibration, multiobjective calibration benefits the spatial parameterization and the simulation of specific processes. However, the requirements of additional observations and the practical procedure are among the reasons to prevent the wider application of the multi-objective calibration. This study proposes to consider three groups of objectives for the calibration: multisite, multi-objective function, and multimetric. For the study catchment with limited observations like the Yuan River Catchment (YRC) in China, the three groups corresponded to discharge from three hydrometric stations, both Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and inversed NSE for discharge evaluation, and MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration product and baseflow filtered from discharge as metrics, respectively. The applicability of two multi-objective calibration approaches, the Euclidean distance and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II, was analyzed to calibrate the above-mentioned objectives for the YRC. Results show that multi-objective calibration has simultaneously ensured the model s better performance in terms of the spatial parameterization, the magnitude of the output time series, and the water balance components, and it also reduces the parameter and prediction uncertainty. The study thus leads to a generalized, recommended procedure for catchments with data scarcity to perform the multi-objective calibration.
CITATION STYLE
He, Q., & Molkenthin, F. (2021). Improving the integrated hydrological simulation on a data-scarce catchment with multi-objective calibration. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 23(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.2166/HYDRO.2021.132
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.