Comparison of acridine orange, acriflavine, and bisbenzimide stains for enumeration of bacteria in clear and humic waters

83Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In highly humic water, acridine orange precipitated with dissolved humic water, resulting in such bright background fluorescence that no bacteria could be seen. With bisbenzimide staining, a similar precipitate was nonfluorescent but obscured many cells. An acriflavine staining method proved useful and reproducible both in clear and in humic waters. Fading of fluorescence was not a problem, and stained samples could be stored after preparation. The fluorescence of cells stained with acriflavine was weaker than that with acridine orange, making counting extremely small cells slightly more difficult with the former stain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bergstrom, I., Heinanen, A., & Salonen, K. (1986). Comparison of acridine orange, acriflavine, and bisbenzimide stains for enumeration of bacteria in clear and humic waters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 51(3), 664–667. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.51.3.664-667.1986

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free