Analysis of Patient Results Distributions To Reevaluate A Reference Range Change For Calcium After A Change in Assay Reagents on the Roche Cobas c500 Analyzer

  • Joneja U
  • McCloskey L
  • Stickle D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A change in reagents for calcium (Ca) on the Roche Cobas c500 analyzer occurred in 2013. The previous reference range (8.5-10.5 mg/dL) was replaced with that from the manufacturer's study (8.6-10.0 mg/dL), based on correlation of results between the new and old assays. Given the historically large fraction (25%) of abnormal Ca results in our patient data, small changes in the reference range can greatly affect numbers of patient results flagged as abnormal. As a matter of quality assurance, therefore, we undertook a reevaluation of the reference range change, using a method based on that of Bhattacharya (1967). In short, this method relies on the assumption that the reference range is a normal distribution, and enables this distribution to be isolated mathematically from within patient distribution data that are not normally distributed. Primary data were all patient Ca results retrieved for a 1-month interval (January, 2014; n = 11,684). Isolation of the data subset compatible with a normal distribution was a two-stage process. First, the point of maximum slope of the cumulative patient results distribution was determined to define the mean/median of the embedded normal distribution (9.4 mg/dL). Second, for varying widths of intervals of results having symmetry around this midpoint, an iterative search was made to determine the central fraction of a normal distribution encompassed by each interval, as evidenced by the linearity of a normality plot when the correct fraction was specified. Results of these procedures converged on a reference range for Ca of 8.6-10.2 mg/dL, essentially identical (±0.1 mg/dL) to numerous “textbook” reference ranges. The results were used to update our Ca reference range. Normal distribution analysis of patient data subsets by this method can be a powerful tool to evaluate reference ranges simply because it can include an otherwise-impractical large number of patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joneja, U., McCloskey, L. J., & Stickle, D. F. (2014). Analysis of Patient Results Distributions To Reevaluate A Reference Range Change For Calcium After A Change in Assay Reagents on the Roche Cobas c500 Analyzer. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 142(suppl_1), A030–A030. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/142.suppl1.030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free