Beyond toolkits: Critical autoethnography and a relational agenda for discourse studies in media and communication

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) faces three vulnerabilities: Eurocentric canons, computational reductionism, and rhetorical decolonization. This article offers a retrospective critical autoethnographic intervention that reimagines CDS as relational practice. Writing as a Filipino communication scholar, I revisit my trajectory—from textbook encounters with multimodal CDA to the theorization of trust cultures and relational sovereignties—to show how scholarly becoming generates theory. From this emerge four provocations: beyond toolkits, beyond textbooks, beyond derivative Souths, and toward ambivalence and hope. I clarify relational critique as an approach that treats relationality as the ontological ground of critique rather than a contextual supplement. I also specify the retrospective autoethnographic materials and analytic stance guiding this inquiry. Rather than rejecting toolkits, I argue for decentering toolkit-centrism by situating methods as secondary to the theorization of social problems. Finally, I outline a relational agenda that bridges interpretive inquiry with emerging computational practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mendoza, K. P. R. (2026). Beyond toolkits: Critical autoethnography and a relational agenda for discourse studies in media and communication. Discourse and Communication, 20(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813261420507

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free