Random-effects models for migration attractivity and retentivity: A Bayesian methodology

20Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Several studies have proposed methods for deriving summary scores for describing the in-migrant attractivity of areas, as well as out-migrant push (or conversely migrant retentivity). Simple in-migration and out-migrant rates (migrant totals divided by populations) do not correct for spatial separation or the migration context of a particular area, namely the size and proximity of nearby urban areas with populations at risk of migrating to an area, or offering potential destinations for out-migrants from an area. An extended random-effects gravity model is proposed to represent the influences of attractivity and retentivity after controlling for urban structure. Whereas the existing literature is focused on fixed effects modelling (and classical estimation), the focus in this paper is on a Bayesian hierarchical random-effects approach that links estimates of pull-and-push scores across areas (i.e. allows scores to be spatially correlated) and also allows correlation between attractivity and retentivity within areas. As demonstrated by a case-study of English local authorities, a random-effects model may have a lower effective model dimension than a fixed effects model. © 2010 Royal Statistical Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Congdon, P. (2010). Random-effects models for migration attractivity and retentivity: A Bayesian methodology. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society, 173(4), 755–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00625.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free