Models for implementing continuing professional development programs in low-resource countries

  • Mack H
  • Golnik K
  • Murray N
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Implementing CPD programs for medical professionals has been demonstrated to improve patient outcomes, and is increasingly required for continuing medical licensure. However, implementing programs in low-resource settings is challenging. This review has identified 5 different models for implementation: 1) twinning, 2) greenfield, 3) formal program guided by international medical bodies, 4) directed by regulators and 5) informal program guided by international medical bodies. The models, advantages and disadvantages and costs are discussed. There is minimal evidence on success of implementation models, and further studies are necessary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mack, H. G., Golnik, K. C., Murray, N., & Filipe, H. P. (2017). Models for implementing continuing professional development programs in low-resource countries. MedEdPublish, 6, 18. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2017.000018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free