A pilot study on environmental and behavioral factors related to missed abortion

34Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the environmental and behavioral factors associated with the induction of missed abortion, with a particular focus on the relationship between job stress and missed abortion. Methods This was a case-control study in which 552 women participated (267 cases, 285 controls). Job stress was measured using the Job Content Questionnaire 1.0 (JCQ1.0). Results The case and control groups were significantly different for many factors, including age, physical exercise, exposure time to cell phone and computer, home refurbishment, ventilation, folic acid supplements, preference for fried food, reproductive knowledge, premarital health screening, parity, and supervisor support (P\0.05). For job stress, the univariate analysis revealed that there was no significant difference between cases and controls. Logistic analysis revealed that physical exercise (2-3 times per week or[3 times per week) [odds ratio (OR) 0.433, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.213-0.881 or OR 0.268, 95% CI 0.106-0.680, respectively], ventilation (OR 0.415, 95% CI 0.251-0.685), folic acid supplements (OR 0.409, 95% CI 0.265-0.633), age (OR 1.102, 95% CI 1.033-1.174), and supervisor support (OR 0.870, 95% CI 0.768- .986) were the significant factors contributing to the missed abortion (P\0.05). Conclusions Physical exercise, ventilation, folic acid supplements, and supervisor support were identified as protective factors for the prevention of missed abortion. Advanced age at pregnancy was a risk factor for missed abortion. © The Japanese Society for Hygiene 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, X., Li, J., Gu, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, Z., & Jia, G. (2011). A pilot study on environmental and behavioral factors related to missed abortion. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 16(4), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-010-0196-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free