Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes according to the change in the rectocele depth between transanal and transvaginal repairs for a symptomatic rectocele

9Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: This study was aimed to compare the results of a transanal repair with those of a transvaginal levatorplasty and to determine the long-term clinical outcomes according to the change in the depth of the rectocele after the procedure. Methods: Of 50 women who underwent a rectocele repair from March 2005 to February 2007, 26 women (group A) received a transanal repair, and 24 (group B) received a transvaginal repair with or without levatorplasty. At 12 months after the procedures, 45 (group A/B, 22/23 women) among the 50 women completed physiologic studies, including anal manometry and defecography, and clinical-outcome measurements. The variations of the clinical outcomes with changes in the depth of the rectocele were also evaluated in 42 women (group A/B, 20/22) at the median follow-up of 50 months. Results: On the defecographic findings, the postoperative depth of the rectocele decreased significantly in both groups (group A vs. B, 1.91 ± 0.20 vs. 2.25 ± 0.46, P = 0.040). At 12 months after surgery, 17 women in each group (group A/B, 77/75%) reported improvement of their symptoms. However, only 11 and 13 women (group A/B, 55/59%) of groups A and B, respectively, maintained their improvement at the median follow-up of 50 months. Better results were reported in patients with a greater change in the depth of their rectocele (≥4 cm) after the procedure (P = 0.001) Conclusion: In both procedures, clinical outcomes might become progressively worse as the length of the follow-up is increased. © 2012 The Korean Society of Coloproctology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chung, C. S., Yu, S. H., Lee, J. E., & Lee, D. K. (2012). Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes according to the change in the rectocele depth between transanal and transvaginal repairs for a symptomatic rectocele. Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology, 28(3), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.3.140

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free