Financial development, industrialization, the role of institutions and government: a comparative analysis between India and China

71Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This research is the first comparative attempt incorporating the role of economic, demographic, sectoral contribution, government and trade in explaining financial development for India and China. Using time-series estimations, we establish that institutional quality and government size impede financial development, whereas urbanization, industrialization and service sector growth help in financial development for both countries. Trade openness also enhances Indian financial development but hinders Chinese financial development. We suggest that the policy advisers should not underestimate the role of urbanization, industrialization and service sector growth in implementing financial development. Finally, we find that the institutions and governments will play a key role for both economies in enhancing finance and growth.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shahbaz, M., Bhattacharya, M., & Mahalik, M. K. (2018). Financial development, industrialization, the role of institutions and government: a comparative analysis between India and China. Applied Economics, 50(17), 1952–1977. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1383595

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free