Standardization in the management of gram-negative bloodstream infections after implementation of a clinical care guideline at a large academic, safety-net institution: A quasi-experimental study

2Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of implementing a clinical care guideline for uncomplicated gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSI) within a health system. Design: Retrospective, quasi-experimental study. Setting: A large academic safety-net institution. Participants: Adults (≥18 years) with GN-BSI, defined by at least one positive blood culture for specific gram-negative organisms. Patients with polymicrobial cultures or contaminants were excluded. Interventions: Implementation of a GN-BSI clinical care guideline based on a 2021 consensus statement, emphasizing 7-day antibiotic courses, use of highly bioavailable oral antibiotics, and minimizing repeat blood cultures. Results: The study included 147 patients pre-intervention and 169 post-intervention. Interrupted time series analysis showed a reduction in the median duration of therapy (-2.3 days, P =.0016), with a sustained decline (slope change -0.2103, P =.005) post-intervention. More patients received 7 days of therapy (12.9%-58%, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deaney, M. A., Shihadeh, K. C., Craig, A., Cooper, M. M., Paratore, P. D., & Jenkins, T. C. (2025). Standardization in the management of gram-negative bloodstream infections after implementation of a clinical care guideline at a large academic, safety-net institution: A quasi-experimental study. Antimicrobial Stewardship and Healthcare Epidemiology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free