Assessing the impact of conventional formwork and Mivan formwork on construction productivity and efficiency

Abstract

The construction sector is continuously exploring innovative strategies to enhance productivity and efficiency. This research project centers on evaluating the use of conventional formwork and Mivan formwork in construction projects, aiming to improve construction productivity and efficiency. The primary objective is to compare the time and cost requirements of these two formwork systems to assess their impact on project outcomes. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative analyses. A comprehensive review of existing literature is undertaken to gather knowledge on conventional formwork, Mivan formwork, construction productivity, and efficiency. Data is collected from construction projects that have employed both formwork systems, and key performance indicators such as project duration, labor productivity, material consumption, and costs are examined and compared. The findings will provide valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of conventional formwork and Mivan formwork. The analysis will identify the factors that influence productivity and efficiency in each system and highlight areas for potential improvement. The ultimate aim of this study is to provide guidance to construction professionals in making informed decisions regarding the selection of formwork systems, taking into account factors such as cost, time, labor requirements, and quality. Additionally, the research will contribute to the existing knowledge base on construction productivity and efficiency, offering recommendations to enhance project outcomes. By identifying the strengths and weaknesses of conventional formwork and Mivan formwork, this study seeks to drive advancements in construction practices and contribute to overall industry improvement.