Prophylactic antibiotics has no benefit for outcome in clean myringoplasty—A register-based cohort study from SwedEar

8Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate if prophylactic antibiotics (PA) in conjunction with myringoplasty of clean and uninfected ears entails a reduction of postoperative infections within 6 weeks after surgery, and whether it affects the healing rate of the tympanic membrane (TM) at follow-up, 6–24 months after surgery. Design: A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. Setting: Data extracted from The Swedish Quality Register for Ear Surgery (SwedEar), the years 2013–2019. Participants: All patients in SwedEar with a registered clean conventional myringoplasty (tympanoplasty type I) including a follow-up visit. Main Outcome Measures: The effect of PA use on TM healing rate at follow-up and postoperative infection within 6 weeks of surgery. Results: In the study group (n = 1665) 86.2% had a healed TM at follow-up. There was no significant difference between the groups that had PA administered (87.2%) or not (86.1%). A total of 8.0% had a postoperative infection within 6 weeks. Postoperative infection occurred in 10.2% of the group that received PA (n = 187) compared with 7.7% of the group that did not receive PA. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Postoperative infection within 6 weeks significantly lowered the frequency of healed TMs. Conclusion: PA administered during clean conventional myringoplasty does not improve the chance of having a healed TM at follow up, nor decrease the risk of having a postoperative infection within 6 weeks after surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Westman, E., Höglund, M., Nilsson, F. B., Bonnard, Å., Englund, E., & Eriksson, P. O. (2023). Prophylactic antibiotics has no benefit for outcome in clean myringoplasty—A register-based cohort study from SwedEar. Clinical Otolaryngology, 48(6), 895–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14089

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free