The roles of surgery and technology in understanding focal epilepsy and its comorbidities

77Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Intracranial electrophysiological recording in patients with refractory focal epilepsy is the gold standard for defining epileptogenic tissue. Although the concordance of intracranial electrophysiology, structural MRI, and pathology can identify brain regions for resection, complete seizure control after surgery is not achieved in all patients with focal epilepsy. Repetitive identical behavioural seizures suggest one onset area, but epileptogenesis might be distributed and connected by functional and structural brain networks outside the seizure onset area, which could explain poor postsurgical outcomes in some patients. Similar networks are postulated in neuropsychiatric disorders, such as depression and anxiety, and seem to overlap with posited epilepsy networks, perhaps explaining the high prevalence of comorbid neuropsychiatric disorders in patients with epilepsy. These networks are difficult to verify with available electrophysiological recording approaches. Advances in intracranial technology are needed to confirm the epilepsy network hypothesis and improve surgical outcomes by providing individualised therapies based on specific network contributions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spencer, D. D., Gerrard, J. L., & Zaveri, H. P. (2018, April 1). The roles of surgery and technology in understanding focal epilepsy and its comorbidities. The Lancet Neurology. Lancet Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30031-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free