Are lifestyle interventions in primary care cost-effective? - An analysis based on a Markov model, differences-in-differences approach and the Swedish Björknäs study

20Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Lifestyle interventions affect patients' risk factors for metabolic syndrome (MeSy), a pre-stage to cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and related complications. An effective lifestyle intervention is the Swedish Björknäs intervention, a 3-year randomized controlled trial in primary care for MeSy patients. To include future disease-related cost and health consequences in a cost-effectiveness analysis, a simulation model was used to estimate the short-term (3-year) and long-term (lifelong) cost-effectiveness of the Björknäs study. Methodology/ Principal Findings: A Markov micro-simulation model was used to predict the cost and qualityadjusted life years (QALYs) for MeSy-related diseases based on ten risk factors. Model inputs were levels of individual risk factors at baseline and at the third year. The model estimated short-term and long-term costs and QALYs for the intervention and control groups. The cost-effectiveness of the intervention was assessed using differences-in-differences approach to compare the changes between the groups in the health care and societal perspectives, using a 3% discount rate. A 95% confidence interval (CI), based on bootstrapping, and sensitivity analyses describe the uncertainty in the estimates. In the short-term, costs are predicted to increase over time in both groups, but less in the intervention group, resulting in an average cost saving/reduction of US$-700 (in 2012, US $1=six point five seven SEK) and US$-500, in the societal and health care perspectives. The long-term estimate also predicts increased costs, but considerably less in the intervention group: US$-7,300 (95% CI: US$-19,700 to US $-1,000) in the societal, and US$-1,500 (95% CI: US$-5,400 to US$2,650) in the health care perspective. As intervention costs were US$211 per participant, the intervention would result in cost saving. Furthermore, in the longterm an estimated 0.46 QALYs (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.69) per participant would be gained. Conclusions/ Significance: The Swedish Björknäs study appears to reduce demands on societal and health care resources and increase health-related quality of life. © 2013 Saha et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saha, S., Carlsson, K. S., Gerdtham, U. G., Eriksson, M. K., Hagberg, L., Eliasson, M., & Johansson, P. (2013). Are lifestyle interventions in primary care cost-effective? - An analysis based on a Markov model, differences-in-differences approach and the Swedish Björknäs study. PLoS ONE, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080672

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free