Validity and Stability of the Decisional Balance for Sun Protection Inventory

  • Yin H
  • Rossi J
  • Redding C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The 8-item Decisional Balance for sun protection inventory (SunDB) assesses the relative importance of the perceived advantages (Pros) and disadvantages (Cons) of sun protective behaviors. This study examined the psychometric properties of the SunDB measure, including invariance of the measurement model, in a population-based sample of N = 1336 adults. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the theoretically based 2-factor (Pros, Cons) model, with high internal consistencies for each subscale ( α ≥ .70 ). Multiple-sample CFA established that this factor pattern was invariant across multiple population subgroups, including gender, racial identity, age, education level, and stage of change subgroups. Multivariate analysis by stage of change replicated expected patterns for SunDB (Pros η 2 = . 15 , Cons η 2 = . 02 ). These results demonstrate the internal and external validity and measurement stability of the SunDB instrument in adults, supporting its use in research and intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yin, H.-Q., Rossi, J. S., Redding, C. A., Paiva, A. L., Babbin, S. F., & Velicer, W. F. (2014). Validity and Stability of the Decisional Balance for Sun Protection Inventory. Journal of Skin Cancer, 2014, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/190541

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free