English Language Teachers’ Psychological Responses to AI Integration: A Grounded Theory Approach

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: This study explored English language teachers’ psychological responses to AI integration and the process through which initial negative emotions evolve with experience and strategic use of AI. Methods and Materials: Using a qualitative grounded theory design, eight part-time English teachers from diverse institutions were recruited via convenience sampling. Data were collected through open-ended, in-depth interviews. Analysis followed Corbin and Strauss’s coding procedures (open, axial, and selective coding) with constant comparison to develop categories and a central explanatory account of teachers’ experiences. Findings: The core category was “Negotiating professional identity in AI-infused classrooms.” Two dominant psychological strains—anxiety and fear—were identified. These emotions were primarily rooted in perceived job obsolescence, threats to professional credibility/identity, and uncertainty about teachers’ evolving roles. As participants gained hands-on experience, many reported a shift toward strategic engagement, describing improved instructional creativity, reduced workload in routine tasks, higher job satisfaction, and better well-being, while still emphasizing the irreplaceable human elements of teaching. Conclusion: AI integration can trigger identity-related distress among ELT teachers, yet purposeful, supported use may transform early anxiety and fear into adaptive empowerment. Professional development should address both technical competence and psychological adjustment (e.g., identity-reframing and ethical guidance) to sustain a healthy balance between AI affordances and human-centered pedagogy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hashemi, M., Ebrahimi, F., & Hashemi, F. (2026). English Language Teachers’ Psychological Responses to AI Integration: A Grounded Theory Approach. International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture, 13(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.61838/ijbmc.v13i1.1149

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free