Different IS Research Communities: Are They Competitors, Complements, or Ignoring Each Other?

  • Loebbecke C
  • Feeny D
  • Weill P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper is based on an ICIS 2002 panel on the role of four different IS Research communities with regard to • topic choice, • project/study acquisition, • research strategy, • respondents and site access, and • expected, measurable outcome and dissemination channel. Although differences are clear and although a probably healthy degree of competition among the communities cannot be denied, at the end all panelists expressed the need for more complementarity and thus cooperation among the different communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loebbecke, C., Feeny, D., Weill, P., Jarke, M., Kambil, A., & Filos, E. (2003). Different IS Research Communities: Are They Competitors, Complements, or Ignoring Each Other? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 11. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01129

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free