Abstract
University students may encounter situations where they perform poorly in a course and contemplate dropping out. This intention to drop out of a course manifests not only in thoughts or ideas but also in a cognitive self-evaluation of their performance and skills, enabling them to reflect on the possibility of dropping out. In this sense, there is a shortage of instruments that evaluate the intention to drop out of a course, so the aim was to develop and validate the Course Dropout Intention Scale (CDIS). Data from two samples (N1 = 198; N2 = 675) were used; the first was for the EFA, and the second was for the CFA, GRM, and SEM. The one-factor model was derived from the EFA and confirmed in the second sample, exhibiting appropriate goodness-of-fit indices. Similarly, the GRM obtained adequate fit indices; all items discriminated adequately, and the difficulty parameter had a monotonic increase. The SEM model of the effect of satisfaction with studies on the CDIS showed a negative and statistically significant effect. Thus, it was demonstrated that the CDIS is a robust instrument in its psychometric properties and empirical evidence with other variables.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Yupanqui-Lorenzo, D. E., Jara-Osorio, L. A., Carbajal-León, C., Caycho-Rodríguez, T., Sernaqué, M. A. C., & Quispe, K. S. D. (2024). Course Dropout Intention Scale: Development and Validation of a New Brief Measure in Academic College Context. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.103
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.