Estimating the economic benefits of avoiding food-borne risk: Is 'willingness to pay' feasible?

14Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, the results of a pilot study of willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid poultry-borne illness are reported. Through this, the problems of devising an economic measure of the 'intangible' benefits of prevention of food-borne risk are explored. The study is the first to allow those against a prevention policy (irradiation of poultry-meat) to register their WTP not to have the policy implemented. The study demonstrates that it is feasible to obtain answers to WTP questions from a self-selected sample. Future studies should ensure greater representativeness of respondents, that better information about benefits is provided to respondents and that an appropriate method of aggregation of benefits is used.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Donaldson, C., Mapp, T., Ryan, M., & Curtin, K. (1996). Estimating the economic benefits of avoiding food-borne risk: Is “willingness to pay” feasible? Epidemiology and Infection, 116(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268800052596

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free