Development and analytic validation of a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the measurement of sugar probes in canine serum

11Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective - To develop and analytically validate a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method for the quantification of lactulose, rhamnose, xylose, 3-O-methylglucose, and sucrose in canine serum. Sample Population - Pooled serum samples from 200 dogs. Procedures - Serum samples spiked with various sugars were analyzed by use of GC-MS. The method was analytically validated by determination of dilutional parallelism, spiking recovery, intra-assay variability, and interassay variability. Results - Standard curves ranging from 0.5 to 500 mg/L for each sugar revealed a mean r2 of 0.997. The lower detection limit was 0.03 mg/L for lactulose, rhamnose, xylose, and methylglucose and 0.12mg/L for sucrose. The observed-to-expected ratios for dilutional parallelism had a mean ± SD of 105.6 ± 25.4% at dilutions of 1:2, 1:4, and 1:8. Analytic recoveries for the GC-MS assays of sugars ranged from 92.1% to 124.7% (mean ± SD, 106.2 ± 13.0%). Intra-assay coefficients of variation ranged from 6.8% to 12.9% for lactulose, 7.1% to 12.8% for rhamnose, 7.2% to 11.2% for xylose, 8.9% to 11.5% for methylglucose, and 8.9% to 12.0% for sucrose. Interassay coefficients of variation ranged from 70% to 11.5% for lactulose, 6.4% to 9.4% for rhamnose, 6.8% to 13.2% for xylose, 70% to 15.9% for methylglucose, and 5.5% to 9.4% for sucrose. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - The GC-MS method described here was accurate, precise, and reproducible for the simultaneous measurement of sugar probes in canine serum.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodriguez, H., Suchodolski, J. S., Berghoff, N., & Steiner, J. M. (2009). Development and analytic validation of a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the measurement of sugar probes in canine serum. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 70(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.70.3.320

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free