Two aspects of activation: Arousal and subjective significance - Behavioral and event-related potential correlates investigated by means of a modified emotional stroop task

33Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The arousal level of words presented in a Stroop task was found to affect their interference on the required naming of the words’ color. Based on a dual-processes approach, we propose that there are two aspects to activation: arousal and subjective significance. Arousal is crucial for automatic processing. Subjective significance is specific to controlled processing. Based on this conceptual model, we predicted that arousal would enhance interference in a Stroop task, as attention would be allocated to the meaning of the inhibited word. High subjective significance should have the opposite effect, i.e., it should enhance the controlled and explicit part of Stroop task processing, which is color naming. We found that response latencies were modulated by the interaction between the arousal and subjective significance levels of words. The longest reaction times were observed for highly arousing words of medium subjective significance level. Arousal shaped event related potentials in the 150-290 ms time range, while effects of subjective significance were found for 50-150, 150-290, and 290-530 ms time ranges.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Imbir, K., Spustek, T., Bernatowicz, G., Duda, J., & Żygierewicz, J. (2017). Two aspects of activation: Arousal and subjective significance - Behavioral and event-related potential correlates investigated by means of a modified emotional stroop task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00608

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free