Predictive Value of Positive Endocervical Curettage Results Obtained During Colposcopy

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the positive predictive value of endocervical curettage (ECC) during colposcopic examination in a dysplasia unit since the implementation of the new cervical cancer screening program in Germany (January 2020). Methods: A total of 202 patients who presented for colposcopy at the Dysplasia Unit of the University Hospital Aachen, Germany, between January 2020 and October 2023, who had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1+ (CIN1+) in the endocervical curettage and received a loop-excisional procedure of the cervix (LEEP), were included in a retrospective cohort analysis using machine learning techniques (random forest analysis and leave-one-out cross-validation). Results: There was a low agreement between the results of the ECC and the CIN status after LEEP (kappa 0.0239). A positive result in the histological specimen of the excisional procedure of the cervix (CIN2+) was obtained in 73.7% in case of CIN1 detection in the ECC, 69.4% in case of CIN2 detection in the ECC, and 80.6% in case of CIN3 in the ECC. In the multivariate analysis, the result of colposcopy and the transformation zone, especially combined (kappa 0.259, p = 0.0004), had the highest predictive value with regard to the CIN status. Conclusions: ECC is associated with a low agreement rate in comparison to the final histological result of the LEEP, which should be kept in mind when counseling patients. A finding of CCIN1in an ECC obtained during colposcopy following abnormal HPV-based cervical cancer screening results should be considered an indication of a possible intracervical dysplasia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wittenborn, J., Cuma, C., Kennes, L. N., Najjari, L., Stickeler, E., & Kupec, T. (2026). Predictive Value of Positive Endocervical Curettage Results Obtained During Colposcopy. Diagnostics, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16070976

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free