'Climate Change isn't Optional': Climate Change in the Core Law Curriculum

12Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper makes a case for the integration of compulsory climate change topics across the core law curriculum. It argues that the most persuasive rationale for this is based in climate legal obligations and institutions, and a clear-eyed perception of climate risk, rather than the sustainability agenda. To this end, the paper outlines efforts taken to 'mainstream' climate change and environmental law education in a core course of the LLB degree - land law. An empirical study sought to evaluate the students' engagement with these materials, and their broader views concerning climate change and their legal education. The paper critically evaluates the course and the results of the empirical study. It concludes that students want to be, and should be, taught climate law and the climate context of law as part of their prescribed learning throughout the core curriculum, rather than as optional or elective content.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouwer, K., John, E., Luke, O., & Rozhan, A. (2023). “Climate Change isn’t Optional”: Climate Change in the Core Law Curriculum. In Legal Studies (Vol. 43, pp. 240–258). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2022.35

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free