HAKIM DAN MEDIASI: Pemaknaan Hakim Terhadap Mediasi Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Pekalongan

  • Rismawati S
  • Askari S
  • Husein M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This sociolegal research was aimed to understrand the judge’s comprehension toward mediation in private lawsuit procession. This comprehension was so urgent in order to understand how pragmatism practice could infiltrate in law court. To do so, I used symbolic interaction approach and model to analyze the data, that snowball-purposively gathered from the Judges. The locus of this study located in Pekalongan District Court (Pengadilan Negeri). The study showed some divergences opinion among judges in understanding the laws/norms/statutes of mediation both, textually and contextually (as they applied the text of norm in their cases). So, it effected on the implementation of enforcement and made them tend to pragmatic in doing mediation as formalistic-routine procedure. The roots of this attitude came from internally factors such pragmatism itself and externally ones, pragmatism among the parties of lawsuit and their advocaats.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rismawati, S. D., Askari, S., & Husein, M. M. (2013). HAKIM DAN MEDIASI: Pemaknaan Hakim Terhadap Mediasi Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Pekalongan. JURNAL PENELITIAN, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.28918/jupe.v9i2.142

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free